Mike Bohan hasn’t been FI CEO long.
His major public announcement thus far has been the removal of IPD and it’s replacement with Match Day Extra. Solid moves, overall.
But there is plenty still to do. Mike Bohan will have a lot on his plate right now and I am sure he and the rest of the FI team is working diligently to move the platform forward.
I haven’t worked for FI for years like he has, and I don’t have access to the internal information he will have either.
But I can offer some thoughts here as someone with many thousands of hours experience of trading on the platform over the years.
I’m going to focus on three things I think would get the market firing – and sustainably this time. Something we all want to see.
The Match Day Experience
Match Day has to be fun.
FI does make watching football more fun. Always has. But we’re missing something at the moment – trading can feel quite exhausting and unrewarding because traders aren’t always reacting to good performances like they used to.
As much as it is a long term product, we need dividend rewards that encourage trading and Make Match Days Fun Again (MMDFA hats are available).
Removal of IPD was a big positive step here. Some argue that they miss this from the Match Day Experience. But it was 100% required to push liquidity into a smaller number of players.
If we want a liquid market where traders can realistically provide liquidity we have to reduce the pool of viable choices to the real stars of European football.
There just is not enough money in this market to provide liquidity for more than 500-750 players and it’s important to acknowledge that. Maybe one day there will be, but not now.
So I was really pleased Bohan grasped the nettle here and took a tough but necessary decision.
The replacement with MDE was a good step too in principle, and I welcomed the concept. I had reservations though with the payout structure and I think the weakness I highlighted is now becoming clear.
Now we’ve seen MDE in action, I don’t think many care much about winning it to be blunt. It is not obviously driving trading. It is not really improving the Match Day Experience.
It’s nice to win a 1p dividend of course, but winning MDE does not make up for the disappointment of having a player come in second after a very strong performance.
And because your 1p can drop into your balance 1 to 6 days from the time of the match… it’s not giving people an exciting instant win either.
To be clear this is not about FI’s generosity – the overall context is that FI are already extremely generous with Match Day and Media Dividends as it is.
My concern is that FI are spending this money on MDE but aren’t really seeing a benefit in terms of increased trading or customer satisfaction. They need to make sure that when they are making payouts they are getting something for their money.
I have two possible solutions, one is a tweak. Another is more radical but potentially better.
This would make MDE a more meaningful payout that traders would be pleased to win:
Scrap 6 places at 1p and instead have 2 places at 3p each.
A cost neutral change for FI that makes winning more meaningful.
This really needs to be combined with a live MDE leaderboard to ensure that there is that sense of match day excitement. If traders can’t actually see the action unfolding live on their app – then as far as trading is concerned it may as well not be happening. Out of sight, out of mind.
– increase the match day excitement as you can see the scores moving in real time,
– lessen disappointment when a player gets a really big score yet comes 2nd,
– make people care more about winning MDE to encourage trading in quality players, which will also be another small factor that would help concentrate liquidity.
Some may say that it is good that any player can feasibly win 1p… but in reality I don’t think any players are really going to survive based on the hope of winning a penny per share.
People might hope that it brings a wider pool of players into the game (which is actually bad for the market as discussed). But in reality, a 1p incentive won’t do that anyway.
The Radical Solution (That isn’t actually that radical)
The above tweak would improve things, but I think we could do better. By stepping back and re-evaluating the prize pool as a whole, we’re able to make sure that dividends are driving trading and rewarding the right sort of behaviour.
I’m bringing Team of the Month into play here.
TOTM is actually quite enjoyable but suffers from two main problems:
– The payouts outside of the top player in each position are quite underwhelming. TOTM was left behind in the last dividend increase and Match Day dividends now make the Monthly ones look tiny.
– TOTM does not give instant rewards that generate excitement on match days. Maybe towards the end of the month once the places are being finalised it does – but you can’t even see a leaderboard for it in real time. So can traders really get excited about this and trade around it? Not really.
I would propose removing both Team of the Month and MDE.
In it’s place would be a simple tiered payout on Match Days, perhaps awarding:
Gold Day – 1st (14p), 2nd (7p), 3rd (3p)
Silver Day – 1st (8p), 2nd (4p)
Bronze Day – 1st place (4p) same as now, with no tiered 2nd place winner.
You’d have to actually be FI to do the full math. But I’d be aiming for pretty much cost neutral overall with these changes. We do not need more dividends, we need to use the ones we have better.
This does three main things:
– Simplifies the experience – There will only be one way to win performance dividends. We can ditch all of the complex explanations of the different types of performance dividends which can turn off new users.
– On a Match Day, you’ll get meaningful wins for coming in 2nd or 3rd. No more howls of anguish when a random spoiler player beats Sancho. Star Man and the 1st place should get the real jackpot. But 2nd or even 3rd should still be satisfying and leave us feeling like the good performance counted.
– Rewards will come near to the event, which is always more exciting than the promise of a dividend up to 6 days or a month from now.
This still rewards holding good players long term. You don’t actually need a weekly or monthly format to do that. Players who can come 1st on Match Days now are the most likely to find themselves in 2nd or 3rd too.
Therefore, whilst this change appears fairly radical, it isn’t. This change won’t really upset any types of trader in particular. There would be no bonfire of the “Team of the Month” or “Match Day Extra” players if these dividends were replaced – it’s all the same players who are likely to get a boost from a tiered payout structure.
If FI can workout a reasonably satisfying payout structure that is pretty much cost neutral to now, this feels like it would be a slam dunk win to me. Not just for existing traders, but the marketing department will be grateful for having a simpler product to explain to new customers too.
Liquidity and (groan) Market Makers
This topic has been done to death but clearly we need Market Makers. But not just any Market Maker.
I have observed the current one “LP0001” doing extremely questionable things that hurt the market rather than help. And all whilst costing FI money.
Market Makers should not be pumping cash in to artificially inflate Blue Button prices to make the prices look nice for a day and create the illusion of confidence. Particularly when they are doing it in players that are already overpriced.
This is utterly self defeating as traders just pocket the profit from that stupid move and exploit the Market Maker. I am stunned this happened honestly because it shows massive naivety that has to be learned from.
We need a Market Maker that is competent to support the prices that deserve to be supported. Using bids smartly to ensure that players with genuine underlying value are stable and tradable. A Market Maker should very rarely be buying on the Blue Button at sticker price.
This will make traders less twitchy and bring confidence to hold good players even if they hit a bit of bad news or have a bad game or two. And crucially, give people confidence to take some risks and buy players when they look strong on Match Day.
Prices that do not deserve to be supported because of a lack of underlying value should be left to drop and should not get Market Maker support. This is a lost bet.
The User Interface Kills Sentiment
The way the user interface is set up amplifies the Blue Button drops at the premium end and actually hides the rises on the Red Button as people make bids.
How do people judge sentiment? They wake up, look on the app, and the prices are presented sorted by pennies in Blue Button Price rises. And because that is what is right in front of traders, that is how they judge how the market is doing.
The way the Blue Button is calculated allows just one medium size trader to push the price down very easily.
And there is almost no competing pressure to push it up because money going in is largely happening on Red Button bids. You’d have to be a special kind of psychopath to click the Blue Button and pay full price for most players right now.
To an extent this is just the reality of what is happening in the market and no way of calculating the numbers can get around this.
But this problem is amplified by the User Interface. It is the Blue Button price, pretty much only forced downwards right now due to the mechanics, that governs sentiment.
That is what is front and centre in FI’s current shop window.
And it should be. We need that information. But why, by the beard of Zeus, do we not also see the upward pressure from bids front and centre?
If money is leaving Bruno or Neymar because the premium end rose as people take profits and naturally place bids in better value players further down, why can I not see this happen easily?
Why can I not sort by spread percentage and see what spreads have closed due to people putting bids in?
Why do FI make the Blue Button penny rise the default at all? Why doesn’t it show 2-3 different metrics that give the full picture?
Why does the price chart not even show the moving spreads almost a year after the Matching Engine was implemented?
The major problem that FI has is confidence. It’s certainly not value. The dividends are exceptionally generous. And there is no shortage of traders who would absolutely love to go for it if they felt more confident.
The user interface may seem like second fiddle to Market Makers. But it’s not. It is possibly more important because it is crucial to sentiment.
We really need the FI shop window to very obviously give us the full picture of what is going on, so that traders can kick this habit of using the penny price rise or fall as the ultimate measure of how things are going.
Market Makers might cover up some cracks but in an Order Book system you need traders to carry the can. And I believe they could in a pool of 500-750 players, with relatively modest Market Maker support.
If a competent market maker was doing his job correctly, we would barely notice. They would be supporting good players, ensuring players with intrinsic value are not overly vulnerable to panic selling. This will provide a base of confidence for traders to trade from.
FI should think carefully about what traders see by default when they login because this matters a great deal.
It should be fair and representative of what is happening on both the buy and sell side. As well as giving more details on the overall performance of the market.
Traders could become a bit more sophisticated than just taking their cue of how things are going from the Blue Button. But they’ll need better information first.
The above isn’t a massive shopping list. They are all quite acheivable measures that by FI social media standards at least should be fairly uncontroversial.
There is time to get this right, and huge potential for prices to rebound towards more rational values. And we’ve seen good changes from the new CEO so far in a short space of time.
But it feels like until all these issues are addressed together, you don’t get the momentum you need for long.
The way the market is constructed in terms of the mechanics and the information provided makes it very hard for the optimisitic traders to win, and very easy for negativity to take hold.
What I’d like to see, even if it takes a little bit more time, is a genuine package of measures like the above that all drop at the same time and are implemented at the time of the announcement, or very soon after.
Trust won’t be restored overnight, or just in one announcement.
This situation will change when traders go through a few weeks of Match Days and see the winners get rewarded, without crashing back down again the next day.
Maybe Market Makers, when first introduced, need to be especially active here in the first few weeks – if only to change the bad habits and negative expectations that traders have left over from the wild IPD trading days.
With just a few weeks of fun and satisfying match days that make sense, I’d have little doubt traders would respond and play a big part in improving liquidity.
But we have an understandably exhausted and frazzled trader base right now who are need of some reassuring next moves from the powers that be.